“Character Assasanation”? Ooorrrrrr “Character Assessment” of Mr. Romney’s Bullying Personality?

Bullying – Missionary Work – Bullying:

“Character Assasanation”? Or “Character Assessment”?

If the latest news of Mr. Romney’s bullying had been a malicious character assasnation, it means that none of these bullying things had even happened in the past and all these are false accusation?

Photo: Lately very hansomized Mr. Romney.

Srurce: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/05/romneys-smart-unsentimental-strategy.html

I heard news about Mr. Romney’s highschool bullying. My impression of this news is, it gives some kind of insight, clue into his character, personality, an important human factor that determines him as a qualified candidate to lead a country that presides as a world’s biggest economic and political giant.

What disturbing is, the level of cruelty of his bullying during his high school days, and picking up the weakests of his schoolmates, instead of other equally competitive opponents of his.   What kind of manhood is this? (I have really itching, troublesome biological system of dealing with people who are not (mentally) man enough.) And hearing these two bullied people already dead by now, even before reaching their 60s? It makes me imagine how hard their lives may have been, probably being prone to be bullied by others?

False Character Assasanation is a Terrible Thing to Do. But Right Character Assessment is a Necessary Step in Choosing a Right Leader.  

The school mates may have been unpleasant to his taste, which nonetheless should not have necessarily provoted his urge to bully them. And then he went on his missionary work in Europe? Does this sound consistent with his previous tendency of bullying? Missionary work seems to be more of character of loving neighbor, other humanbeings rather than bullying; is it possible that some people can suddenly change their inborn nature from bullying to loving- other umanbeings- and go back to bulling thing again?)

And then, after college / higher education, he went into business, Bain Capital, that basically hunt for weak business entities to make profits.  The choice of his work seems to indicate that his personality factor of targeting, prying into weak beings in troubles and hunting for them, which seems to not have stopped with his high school graduation but continued into his future life through his choice of job. It’s seems be the nature of more of ruthless predator, rather than moral humane leader whom takes advantage of weak people / parties rather than protecting them. In this sense, his experience as a missionary, which i thought as a positive factor regardless of his religious background, seems to be more of automatic, habitual act of his upbringing as a Mormon and religious environment rather than any personal conviction, religious act.

Normally, people’s highschool behavior can be considered as a thing of silly past. But in this case, it seems to be the clue of who he actually is in the continum of his life and what kind of leader he will be. His statement ”People are jealouse of rich people, him being rich, doesn’t ring as a righteous, sincere statement………

Thesedays, so often, we hear people calling political leaders as “Prophet” worldwide. so i don’t use that word that much anymore. But, “Have you heard about “Bullying Prophets”?

if the post is too drastic, editing would be welcomed.; “labor value or wage disperancy between day and night shift.” what? anyway, need wage.

“Secret Service Prostitution Scandal Roils DC”: Is It That Surprise To You? We all Knew That All the Time.

Update: “military cannot get..” Answer: i am not sure what to say. when men (including military) have urge, the rule of thumb seems to be “men gotta do whatever men gotta do.” (and blame women for all the consequences) there seem to be nothing that much to make these men stop. it’s not just military issue. here, just a while ago, there was the major debate of contraception, and the bigger issue of abortion, single mothers becoming caterpillars. there are also huge AIDs issues. all these issues only deal with the consequences of “you know what,” which result from male tendency of “you know what.” but nobody talks about how to deal with the “Mother Cause” of “you know what,” but only argue with the consequences, dump all the blames onto “the B – women,” condemn how modern females are such immoral B- (who was the female law student who representatively took the charge of this attack.).

Going back to the original issue, to prevent military taking foreign p-, will their american wives, girlfriends, or females be shipped to the foreign military sites? or demand them to live like “monks”?

Original Writing: It is kind of surprised to see the above news breaking out as a surprise, shock to the US public and causing some kind of political drama. My first reaction was, “So?” I was very much puzzled. Because that kind of practice have been very much “Business As Usual” in Asian countries for decades and centuries, no matter who were in political leadership. As far as I knew.

(picture source: http://freakymartin.com/nitro/webpark/47e55112ef546usa_secret_service_3.jpg; the picture is just randomly chosen from internet.)

As an Asian who have heard about the presence of US military bases in home countries and how US military personnels have been living there and date/slept with Asian women, the news is no surprise to me at all. Actually the news have been typical cases of how military people got dates or do physical activities with foreign women when there military bases located in foreign countries. It has been well known private history of american soldiers for decades, centuries. nothing new at all.

Usually, in Asia, such as in Korea or Vietnam, since mid-20th century or probably before that, throughout Korean War or Vietnam War, or Japanese Invation of Asia before those wars, the asian women that foreign soldiers have got in touch with, slept with have been mostly prostitutes, or those women who have been marginalized in these countries because of low socio-economic classes and lack of education, can not get normal lives with their own citicizes. So, these women gathered around forein military bases for work and prostitution. Thererore, the majority of women who had lived around military bases and got in touch with US military have been either prostitutes or marginalized females that had been deserted by their own country people. The American soldiers who had stationed there probably didn’t know who those women were when they either dated or bought their escort services with money. And some of them got married with those women and brought them to this country. This is hidden, private history of cold war, Korean War, or Vietnamese war. Wars, the presence of US military bases in underdeveloped countries often provided the matchmaking of US soldiers and prostitutes or marginalized women of underdeveloped countries. In that sense, the US provide the new life for these marginalized Asian women to refreshingly enter this country as the wives of US soldiers and start brand new lives with their past history behind. From childhood, we heard about these women and people criticizing, pointing fingers to these women back in my country. This has been happened not just under Mr. Obama’s nose, but under those of Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton, Mr. Bush, Mr. Reagan, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. …….All the time.

The prostituting of America security personnel (except the danger of leaking security information of national affair to other informants) have been daily matter of facts around US military bases all around the world.

It has been very recent phenomena that US solders got in touch with, involved with some females of general public, outside military bases, occasionally some females of high school or college degrees with normal lifestyles and got married to. As time goes by, those Asian people‘s biased perception toward foreign military personells have been gradually eased and the number of this kind of marriage have been (very) slowly increasing. But, going back the time, the number of prostitutes getting married with American soldiers have been the majority.

In this sense, the majority of foreign or Asian wives of US military personnel in this country, the majority of this demographic group used to be from that entertainment industry in other underdeveloped countries, who turned into (probably many of them) as american citizen here.  And the US military’s engagement of sexual conduct with Asian women or foreign women (mainly prostitutes) in those countries have been one of major factors that have agonized those countries’ hatred of American hegemonic power. Becuase they considered that US soldiers have been dirtied their women, even when the majority of those women were deserted, isolated by their own people and got married with American soldiers to survive and start new lives in this country. 

As a matter of fact, when i moved to this town, and when i didn’t know anybody around, the person whom i accidently met at a store introduced me to a small group of Korean women who were married to US soldiers. i was introduced to that group of women, without me awaring, because my marriage was interacial. In the beginning i had no idea of whom they were. After some months, i realized that some of these women were of possibly ex-prostitutes whose education was that of elementary school or middle school level, not comfortable to read books or bible. but they have been enthusiastic activists in churchs, raise their voices and power in churches. these women actually became my hunting memory.  poverty or difficult past sometimes drive people vicious. maybe not always, but sometimes. These women also belonged to the same church in which another korean wife of hawaian origin whose husband was running some local hospital chain and got involved in local politics. So, in some sense, my perception was, these ex-prostitues have been partial local representative of me. that was my perception. it had been kind of hunting memory.

My point is, when these prostitution case is investigated, the history of US military bases in foreign countries should be based on. And this is not one single, unique case but a part of everyday incidences, which accidently got exposed to the media.   

i guess, i feel lost. without l. don’t know why have to live. that’s probably been my nature. that’s why i felt horrible whole through the time. a few days ago, i slept  though the night, didn’t hear a thing despite all thundering, when tonado was sweeping the town just 2-3 miles away from where i was. didn’t hear a thing, not a single sound. my seperation cured my insomnia, slept like a babyso often, even despite the ordeal of post-war trauma like. but still felt hope. but not now. what now.

In the Jungle of Minds, Waiting for the Chess Master, the Savior (of Mankind?)

2 cor 2:14: “But thanks be to God, who always leads us as captives in Christ’s triumphal procession and uses us to spread the aroma of the knowledge of him everywhere.”

http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-poll-obama-leads-romeny-by-9-points-20120416,0,371413.story?track=rss

i wouldn’t believe myself of how excited i was to read the above article. simply because to read about not so simple (although not extremely complicated either yet, according to the article) “mind jungle” of prospective voters on deciding whom they will vote for the 2012 election. how the leverages of different factors – such as (GOD the Father) gender, income gap, age/generation gap, political affiliation or independence, candidates’ personal characteristics / performances, interest groups / superPAC, pro- or anti-incumbent voting patterns, socio-economic environments, sudden natural or man-made disasters, irrational factors such as palin, joe plummer, and what was her name? Ann Gosling? (Ouuuch. My apology to Ms. Hilary Rosen. i got confused her name with someone else’s. then who is Ann Gosling?)(Suddenly one woman seemingly, momentarily became an accidental spokeswoman for the president without appointment or being asked by him or his party? interesting. it makes me wonder how the president or his party will be able to control the potential possible millions of independent opinions of invisible, unexpected, uninvited spokespeople who may accidentally enter the national stage of mumbles and bumbles?), or hollywood-style-gossips, etc. etc.- will play out, interact with each other to drive the majority of voters to vote for one candidate.

“We Don’t Know Exactly Who Will Suddenly Represent Us “Out of Nowhere.” We Just Wish that They are Friends, or Friendly People, not Opponents. Not Those who are Hostile, Not so Informed, or Mentally Challenged. Just “Hope” for the Best.” 

and how campaigners can control these different factors’ leveraging power in voters’ minds toward the winning point. it certainly sounds exciting. i wish i have no life, nothing to do or worry, so can simply stuck at my (favorite) place to play with these puzzle pieces. as a risk-averter in real life in most cases, this would be the place to play imagination and guessing most wildly. Inside human mind. (oh, no, i have to be careful for what i wish for. so my revision of my wish: good life with love, happiness, respectful/mighty husband with respectful friends with their moral, decent wives (who are proud of their own hudsbands so don’t have to hit on somebody else’s husbands) to have occasional pleasant dinners together and talk about the world and life together (i’d been sick and sick of my ex’s no-friends-only-eyeballing low-class-junki-women-and-wamanizing policy), beautiful children (with their nannies hopely if both of us have enough income, and beautiful things around, and spend the quite some part of my time on something meaningful, productive projects to make my life fulfilling (and generate some income too to sustain life in that way).

“A Game of Chess in a Jungle of Minds”

Anyway, although the latest Gullup polling shows the different result, CNN results indicate President Obama’s lead over Mr. Romney in most of these various factors. 

http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-poll-obama-leads-romeny-by-9-points-20120416,0,371413.story?track=rss

“fought like ferrets” “earth like colors”….the issue of single mom, working mom may be possible subject to explore, another potential issue such as inequality…..different kind of inequality, gender and religious discrimination, more integregated / systhesized issue of many different sujects….seeing the amazing turn around of contraception issues….. although i don’t know it quite yet.:

The ex seems to be trying to hijack this site also, same as he did with my e-mail accounts. when try to log in, it seems to go fishing site with different web address.; the case is continued to next month. the judge asked what i want, program or guilty /pr….but the case is simply over sooner or later probably.; this is so called i-don’t-know, what-the -h- situation. justice is justice, independent from forgiveness. but while still relying on financially. what-the-h-; it was somewhat fun to write this post. enjoyable.

War on caterfiller: at least a caterpillar likes the defeative nature.

i read the below news with puzzling interest, amazement and enjoyment to see national politics comes down almost to my “Cupcake” level, that of an (sometimes) (semi) extremely immature person (or could it be the sign of extreme maturity overloaded? by the way, why the thunder is roaring in the sky, while i’m contemplating this? it did again.):

“Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus on Wednesday dismissed the suggestion of a “GOP war on women,” saying on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital With Al Hunt”: “If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we’d have problems with caterpillars. It’s a fiction.”

source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-supports-women-august-national-party-courts-women-175403106.html

Women are “Caterpillars”? 

Ummmmmmm, before, i never thought about myself as that little cute insect (are they categorized as insect? or babies of insect?). i cannot really touch it. my kids sometimes intentionally push it toward me to make fun of me, to make me surprise and run away. it’s not because i dislike it. it’s because of some excessive gross hormone in my head. my overall concept of caterpillar is cute one, as children’s books say so. can i be one of those little cute ones too? whmmmmmmmm……

i hadn’t consider myself as a woman that much. i considered self as more like between men and women. physiologically categorized as one of women, but psychologically closer to men. so, occassionally, if any guy seemed to be interested in me or so, i asked myself “why?”. but now, i seem to be more like a women if i stand in front of strong male presence. (but if i stand in front of women, i feel more like a man speaking in woman’s voice, i guess. or not?) so, i’m one of those cute (possibly brainless, thinkingless) caterpillars, i guess. i like it!

manufatured? so what. everything is manufactured. naturally or man-madely. biologically, or technologically, or businessly.

“even truth, justice, fairness are man-made.” 

did somebody declare war on me caterpillar?; what is “domestic violence review hearing”? last time, was told that new date will be probably for plea bargaining. but it seems to be not. this stupid thing, what a waste of life.; will have to move.; which paramour? if it’s that paramour, i feel bone-shrieking sympathy for her. my sincerely condolence for her future tragic life. her rather obese husband might have been a better knight in shining armor than my ex. she wouldn’t never know it until she regrets into her bones through her life.; “jesus rescues me”

Is there any way of measuring the impact of stimulus package on the US economy?

i woke up with this notion, which i should have remembered, but forgot remembering earlier.

Earlier, some economists warned that the size of the first recovery package was not big enough to make a significant impact on the US economy and unemployment situation.

If that had been the case, the outcome of computable generalized equilibrium model of the recovery package on the US economy and employment may not be impressive. In that case, as economists may do so as standard procedure, the CGE analyses may be run with several scenarios of the different sizes of recovery packages: (A) the case of the actual recovery package, (B) the benchmark scenario of no recovery package, (C) several scenarios of what if the recovery package had been far bigger, what would have happened to the economy and unemployment? (with a few scenarios of bigger, far bigger recovery package sizes; may provide good justification of future recovery packages)

Original Text: It’s again a random thought. The kind of thing that pops out when doing random things, like driving, doing dishes, chores, or taking shower etc. i seem to do more intensive thinking when doing dishes or grocery etc. Again, while i was driving, it occurred to me that maybe there may be a possibility of measuring the impact of the economic stimulus package on the US economy. It’s because, although the stimulus package has done something good in terms of creating jobs, improving the US economy, it still gets criticized, attacked by ignorant people. And the only defense of the package has been “It Could have Been Worse” without it. 

“Computable general equilibrium (CGE) model”

i don’t know this model in detail. i hadn’t used it.  if i had stayed in academia i would have taken the training program for using this model. i just read the rough description of this model. it just occur to me that there may be a way of measuring the effect of stimulus package on the US economy by using this CGE model. As wickipedia shows, “CGE models are a class of economic models that use actual economic data to estimate how an economy might react to changes in policy, technology or other external factors. CGE models are also referred to as AGE (applied general equilibrium) models.

The outcome of this model may vary, depending on how the model settings are conditioned by the analysts, which economists do the analysis with what intention, etc. But if properly, fairly done, this model could be a way of answering, closing this arguments of recovery package and finding the justification of having another one??? Probably right economists should have some answer to this.

President Obama’s State of Union Speech: “It’s as good as it gets.”

This morning, while i was driving my girl to her school, i heard radio news comment about “President’s State of Union Speech, saying that “it’s as good as it gets.” I believe so, too. Frankly speaking, i was a bit tired and felt like getting cold last night. So while listening to it, i fell in sleep. This morning, i heard bits of the speech from here and there. So, i post the you tube site of that speech here, frankly speaking, as for my later reference to go back.

Before the speech, there was a comment that the State of Union Speech usually doesn’t affect the outcome of incumbent president’s re-election prospect so much. But, after the speech, i hear that the Speech may pave the road for President’s re-election.

“President Obama’s “Gizillian-Dollar-War-Chest””

(although i have no sense of how much gizillian dollar would be.) I believe President’s State of Union Speech was an elaborately well woven tapestry of well developed, deepened political strategies, policies, giving us the clues of the well seasoned leader’s elaborate political skills and depth, along with unyielding passion, even after three years of steering the tough salty stormy political water. The texture of his speech gives the taste of the difference of his experience before and after he entered the Presidency, but the same person with same or greater vigor, passion, and more seasoned strategic thinking that don’t disappoint us but reassure us “Who He Is.” His emphasis on “Economic Equality” and “Tax” issues are right on target while the gradual recovery of US economy and the tough battle of GOP primary make his sailing to re-election smoother. It appears that President is approaching his second-term with another storm, but with different kind of waves than his first ones. Some say that his speech (i heard that the major part of the speech is Mr. Obama’s own writing) was too long, should have been shorter, more efficient; but i like it better in that way, because it shows the amount, strength of his enthusiasm on it, that made him forget about efficiency, a minor point compared to the importance of contents and specifics. i hear praises about how specific his policy suggestions, unlike his predecessors’. Some say that he should have bragged more about his achievements. One of good parts of the speech, i think, was “We Cannot Go Back to Where We Were.” (am i saying correctly?) After the late night speech (i’d say, because i fell in sleep), he is out on campaign trail to Arizona, Iowa, Michigan…..right next this morning. whhhhhhmmmmmm.

And he shows his respect to other cultures.

i respect people who sincerely fulfill their callings.

“As Gingrich’s fate rises, so does Obama’s” (Yahoo News)

“The evangelical dilemma in South Carolina: adulterer or Mormon?”

The above catch phrase almost seems to foreshadow, bear symbolic meaning on the current, future trend of GOP presidential candidates’ campaign for the 2012 election. The continuous, unpredictable twists of the candidates’ fates don’t fail to blow our minds off. The newest twist of campaign trend is well summarized in the below graph from Yahoo News. The battle between two major GOP contenders appears to have increasingly reduced their chances of winning the White House while strengthening President’s chance of re-reigning for the second term. It’s a relief, as it seems that what GOP candidates are talking sound like they may reverse any recovery or progress made for the last a few years back to the previous condition or worse while President’s policy agendas are getting healthier, more focused, more improved.

“the Gingrich-Romney battle determines about 87.5 percent of the variability in Obama’s likelihood of reelection. To wit, for every 10 percent more likely Gingrich is to win the nomination, Obama is 0.75 percent more likely to win reelection. For every 10 percent less likely Romney is to win the election if he wins the nomination, Obama is 2.75 percent more likely to win reelection.”

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/gingrich-fate-rises-does-obama-133152405.html

Obama Addresses Job Creation For Election Year (Video) and GOP ect..

Obama Addresses Job Creation For Election Year

“President Barack Obama’s “billion-dollar war chest”"

 

We are proud of it.

Still things seem to be going all right, toward reasonable directions. And there is an “INTRIGUING,“ “HILLARIOUS“  title of  Yahoo news.:

 

“The evangelical dilemma in South Carolina: adulterer or Mormon?” 

 

“For South Carolina conservatives, especially evangelical Christians, the 2012 campaign season is the year of magical rethinking. Look at the frontrunners:

If you want a president with a legacy of marital fidelity, you’re going to have to work around Newt Gingrich’s adultery.

If you believe that Mormons don’t really qualify as Christian, you may find yourself struggling with Mitt Romney.“

 

“almost-dead.bz.cm” you are none of my concern. you are too stupid, trivial, meaningless, filthy, same with your Russian whore and her stupid husband. YOU THINK I”M ALMOST DEAD?; your life has been useless, full of dirts with your dirty heart/eyes, even messing up churches with your filthy, dirty eyes. The LORD will deal with you, what you have done. not me. Despite all cruel/brutal things you’ve done to make me disappear, why do you think i’m still here?

“In your righteousness, bring me out of trouble. In your unfailing love, silence my enemies; destroy all my foes, for I am your servant.” “The LORD has rewarded me according to my righteousness, according to the cleanness of my hands in his sight. To the faithful you show yourself faithful, to the blameless you show yourself blameless, to the pure you show yourself pure, but to the crooked you show yourself shred. You saved the humble but bring low those whose eyes are haughty. You, O LORD, keep my lamp burning; my God turns my darkness into light…..You broaden the path beneath me, so that my ankles do not turn. I pursued my enemies and overtook them; I did not turn back till they were destroyed. I crushed them so that they could not rise; they fell beneath my feet. You armed me with strength for battle; you made my adversaries bow at my feet. You made my enemies turn their backs in flight, and I destroyed my foes. They cried for help, but there was no one to save them – to the LORD, but he did not answer. I beat them as fine as dust borne on the wind…“ “Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.”;  Psalms 18″ Thank G-.

Mr. Romney’s Dilemma to Economy is Similar to Mr. Gingrich’s Dilemma to Morality. Isn’t It?

As many people seem to more seriously consider the unignorable flaw in Mr. Gingrich’s background and started supporting Mr. Romney more in the GOP race, Mr. Romney’s rating seems to be soaring. But as got to think of Mr. Romney’s background as a businessman, i cannot not notice the seemingly comparability, similarity between Mr. Gingrich and Mr. Romney’s background, though in different dimensions. The similarities between them are:

Mr. Gingrich Vs. Morality:

Reason: it’s not just about his infidelity, having two wives (or three?). it goes far beyond the number of his wives.)

Mr. Romney Vs. Economy:

(Reason 1) Have we considered his background as a businessman? Rooted in “Which Industry”? The industry that has had nothing to do with the current Great Recession?

(Reason 2) The Out-of-Proportion size of the Financial Industry in the US economy (while other manufacturing has been quickly declining in this country) has been “One” of major reasons that have contributed to the overall unhealthy / unbalanced structure of US Economy, Income Inequality / Middle Class Crisis, and unhealthy employment/unemployment structure in this country.

If financiers in this country had had some level of vision for future and took their desire for business profits to moderation, the industry could have been a very healthy contributing factor to the healthy US economy by now. But the reality has been completely, disasterusly opposite to this dream. So, it seems very irony to invite one of them to lead this country’s economy, especially at this time of deepest recession. Don’t you think?

(Reason 3) Let’s be frank. While working for his equity firm, he had decomposed companies, not building. Decomposing is not a synonym of building. Can the experience of decomposing firms be a good base for building economy?

(Reason 4) Studying business means learning how to “MICRO-MANAGE” a company, and beat out other competitions, I believe. It’s all about “MICRO-MANAGEMENT” of a piece, not the whole. When even a famous gifted economist (economists are supposed to be whole-piece managers, seeing the big pictures in general) cannot get the big picture of economy correctly, is there any particular reason for us to believe that a micro-manager of a piece can see the big picture of economy well, get it right?

If business managers had have managed their businesses correctly and had some visions, why the whole chunks of American industries/business have disappeared, have been wiped out? Where are all those old Great American companies of electronics, machines, textiles, cars, toys, shoes, you name them, thesedays?

Besides, when Mr. Romney said, “Mitt Romney on Thursday sought to portray President Barack Obama as out of touch with the struggles of everyday Americans — a charge he himself has often faced — by comparing the president to a former French queen who was overthrown during the French Revolution. When the president’s characterization of our economy was, ‘It could be worse,’ it reminded me of Marie Antoinette: ‘Let them eat cake.” (source: “Mitt Romney: President Obama Out Of Touch Like Marie Antoinette””

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/29/mitt-romney-compares-pres_n_1175230.html), it was puzzling whether:

When he said “it reminded me of Marie Antoinette: ‘Let them eat cake”,“Did Mr. Romney confuse himself with “Ms. Sarah Palin?””

Did he at least say it in man’s voice?

i Couldn’t feel his “Manhood.” And the comparison doesn’t even make sense. It is like “What the…?” It’s not the kind of statement or comparison that public could expect to hear from a “To-Be-Great-Leader.” i desperately wish to be able to respect the person if he is going to be a nation’s leader. And when read his statement as below, it’s puzzling whether he has any idea about how economy works, or has understood what economists have said about the economy.

“This has been already the worst recovery since Hoover. [Obama] may say it’s getting better and try to take credit for the fact that the economy recovered. But the economy will always recover,” Romney said. “We’ve never gone into permanent recession or depression. The economy will come back after recession. The question is, did he help it or hurt it? Did he prolong the pain or reduce the pain? The truth is he made things harder to recover, he made more people suffer longer.”

The Issue of “Income Inequality” Steps over the Issue of “Economy”, “Unemployment.”

Finally, the issue of “Income Ineqality” appears to have became the Primary Issue of 2012 Election Campaign.

As 65% of people thinks that “Double Dip Recession is a Certainty in near future.”  

http://news.yahoo.com/economic-inequality-issue-2012-campaign-085000009.html

Excerpt: “Fighting to win over unhappy American voters, President Barack Obama and his Republican challengers are seizing on one of the most potent issues this election season: the struggling middle class and the widening gap between rich and poor. Highlighted by the Occupy movement and fanned by record profits on Wall Street at a time of stubborn unemployment, economic inequality is now taking center stage in the 2012 presidential campaign, emphasized by Obama and offering opportunities and risks for him and his GOP opponents as both sides battle for the allegiance of the angst-ridden electorate. For Obama, who calls boosting middle-class opportunity “the defining issue of our time….”

Two Christmas Presents from G – to the lord within a span of a few days.; God seems to have delivered the inquiry. As much as stay in Him.